Essay on Ukraine Population crisis - 958 Words

Purcell Consulting Company is world’s foremost independent consulting company regarding policy issues for governments, and we are glad that you have chosen us in helping with your policies. As addressed in your personal statement, you are extremely concerned about your country’s population decline, and the years to come. This problem, distressing to say, is notably related to the way your government is governed, as well as other factors including health issues, and economics that puts a strain on the your population. In this assessment I will brief on specific reasons for your countries declining population, as well as sufficient solutions in solving this apprehensive problem. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;First I would first like to†¦show more content†¦Economics, as mentioned above, is why there is a failing health care system. Most citizens can’t afford to have regular check ups for their health. Most are rather concerned with saving and earning enough money for food and shelter for themselves and their family. In addition, due to economics, fertility rates have also dropped. Dr. Wolowyna believes that Ukrainian couples decide not to have children due to the inability to support a child (Health care, school and etc), as well as to be besieged by economic responsibilities of aging relatives and spouses (Jarosewich). Furthermore, Ukraine’s population is also at a decline due to migration. For example, official Ukrainian statistics state that about 100,000 people emigrated from Ukraine to neighboring countries such a Poland and Russia. Ukraines parliamentary commissioner for human rights, Nina Karpecheva, claimed last year that about 7 million Ukrainians were seeking work abroad because of poverty and unemployment at home (Jamestown). In my opinion as well as Dr. Wolowyna, Ukraine’s declining population is a â€Å"primary reflection of [Ukraine’s] economic crisis (Jarosewich). nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;In hopes of stopping a declining population, you must enforce new innovated governmental policies in Ukraine. For example, you must boost your economy by providing more jobs. A good way to do this is to learn from other countries, such as India.Show MoreRelatedUkraine Case Study819 Words   |  4 PagesIn early 2014, Russia made the decision to conduct an illegal military intervention into Ukraine. It all began when there was a dispute over whether Ukraine should accept financial help from Russia or Europe, which then ascended into the ousting of the Ukrainian president and then invasion of Ukraine. More specifically, Russia began to taking over the Ukraine territory of the Crimean Peninsula through illegal use of force (Global Security, 2016). During that time, the Russian government voted toRead MoreCrisis in the Ukraine1425 Words   |  6 PagesCrisis in the Ukraine Ukraine Crisis has been the main hot global issue of the 2014. Two nations, Ukraine and Russia, were and are all over the internet, newspapers and newscasts. What is going on in nations that have their reputation of being the nation of the hot girls? Before we dig in any further, let’s look at the historical background of these two nations. Past is one of the most important factors that one should be never underestimate when one wants to know about the current circumstancesRead MoreThe Ukraine Crisis In Ukraine958 Words   |  4 Pagesthen-president of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych, suspended the preparations for the implementation of a publically supported association agreement with the European Union. As the result of Yanukovych’s decision, public protests erupted in the capital city of Kiev. After months of unrest, the protestors managed to oust Yanukovych, who fled to Russia for asylum. Following Yanukovych’s ousting, social unrest erupted around the country, especially in the Russophone eastern and southern regions of Ukraine. As theRead MoreThe Israeli Palestine Conflict And Conflict1430 Words   |  6 Pages  Table of Contents World Map 3 Israeli-Palestine Conflict 4 Location 4 Summary of events 4 Parties concerned 4 Potential solutions 4 Ukraine Crisis 5 Location 5 Summary of events 5 Parties concerned 5 Potential solutions 5 Conflict in the South China Sea 6 Location 6 Summary of events 6 Parties concerned 6 Potential solutions 6 Rankings 7 Bibliography 8  World Map http://www.worldmapsonline.com/images/murals/miller_world_physical_wall_mural_lg.jpg Israeli-Palestine ConflictRead MoreThe Easiest Solution, When Discussing The Eastern Ukrainian1745 Words   |  7 Pagespro-Russian side. However, that is not necessarily the most rational conclusion to make. Ukraine is a country that has had its share of invaders and has often been forced to make choices for the greater good of the ethnic populations. The country’s borders have been rewritten throughout wars, rises and falls of empires, and when claiming independence. Countries have tried to absorb Ukraine and transform the populations, in order, to make them more dependent on the Mother country. Russia is not the firstRead MoreEssay On Ukraine1142 Words   |  5 PagesUkraine is granted a market economy status by the EU and USA. The sharp economic decline in the 90s resulted in deteriorating living standards for most citizens and widespread poverty. However, during the 21st century, there has been some positive economic growth in Ukraine, as well as Eastern Europe as a w hole. Ukraine’s currency, the Hryvnia, was introduced in September 1996 and has remained relatively stable. The unstable political situation in Ukraine hardly influences its economic developmentRead MoreUkraine : The Largest Country Of Eastern Europe1085 Words   |  5 PagesUkraine is the largest country in Eastern Europe, having 603,700 square kilometers. Central Ukraine is covered with plateaus and fertile plains, they also have grasslands. The Black Sea Coastal Lowlands cover the southern borders of their country. The Dnieper River, one of the major rivers of Europe flows from Russia, through Belarus and Ukraine, to the Black Sea. The capital and largest city is Kiev. Ukraine has plenty of natural resources, which helped them develop an economy with significant agriculturalRead MoreRussia s Intervention During The Ukrainian Crisis1673 Words   |  7 PagesWith the current civil war in Ukraine unfolding and Russian involvement being well known, the average person would consider this a very simple situation of Russia flexing its might. While there is some truth for Russian involvement being exactly that, the reasoning for Russia’s foreign policy is a much more complex situation that cannot be summarized into one definitive reason. In fact, there are a variety of factors that could be categorized into three groups known as the three levels of analysisRead MoreChanging the Genre of a Blog Article668 Words   |  3 Pagesand I chose was about the Ukrainian crisis. The primary genre is a blog post from The Washington Post and the secondary genre is a poem. It is not easy to say which genre works the best in this situation; however the primary genre is more effective because it is well organized, presents facts, and includes details. The primary genre is the blog article from the online newspaper. The author of this article argues that there are many reasons why the crisis in Ukraine happened and that there are many sidesRead MoreConflict Between Russia And The Soviet World Essay1415 Words   |  6 PagesMPP 195. Term Paper—Conflict in Crimea Jiewen Zhao Introduction The Crimea Peninsula, located between Kherson of Ukraine and Kuban of Russia, is a major land mass almost completely surrounded by the Black Sea, providing it an extremely important geopolitical position in Eastern Europe. Because of its special geopolitical position, Crimea always has strategic significance to Russia. In history, Crimea was annexed to the Russian Empire in 1783 and, following the Russian Revolution of 1917, became a

Bullying Is A Form Of Action Made By An Aggressive Person

Bullying is a form of action made by an aggressive person, and which it involves a direct or indirect approach to another person. The imbalance of power between the parties involved are dominating and submission. This behavior involves a negative pattern, having to deal with physical, verbal, gestural or non- verbal actions. The impact of emotional effects, and the long term consequences it holds for a person being targeted by this action. The new form of bullying is â€Å"Cyberbullying† through electronic gadgets utilizing texting from cell phones, posting on networking sites, and the Internet. This niggling conveys tormenting others on another level, publicly discrediting their integrity. This is a quick and exclusive way of tantalizing a†¦show more content†¦In any case one negative behavior will not justify the other. Most children are pushed into a corner to regain their social status and lash out in pain with violence to get their redemption. The bullies have problems with dealing with the basic values of rules and regulation, but seem to have no problems with understanding misbehaving and breaking the moral rules. Bullies interpretation of rules is breaking the moral rules to justify hurting people is acceptable. It could be a two way street with being a bully and being bullied, both parties are emotionally affected. The child that is the bully could have environmental problems, which enhance their feeling to hurt others. The feelings buried inside could stem from child abuse, rejection at home, isolating, and socially disconnected. Using these hurtful techniques against others could relieve the pain they have embedded deep inside. This type of behavior will shun the true feelings they are trying to conceive of others. In some ironic way it is a silent cry for help with their own torment they are dealing with. The bullies seem to have more going on in the lives than the victims, the victims merely fall in the path of this rampage of fury going on inside the bully. Another bullying situation is the child that stand by and witness another child being bullied. Even is the child is not the target the innocent bystanders is suffering with anxieties of will they be

American and French Revolutions Free Essays

string(37) " his own execution on July 28, 1794\." A watershed event in modern European history, the French Revolution began in 1789 and ended in the late 1790s with the ascent of Napoleon Bonaparte. During this period, French citizens razed and redesigned their country’s political landscape, uprooting centuries-old institutions such as absolute monarchy and the feudal system. Like the American Revolution before it, the French Revolution was influenced by Enlightenment ideals, particularly the concepts of popular sovereignty and inalienable rights. We will write a custom essay sample on American and French Revolutions or any similar topic only for you Order Now Although it failed to achieve all of its goals and at times degenerated into a chaotic bloodbath, the movement played a critical role in shaping modern nations by showing the world the power inherent in the will of the people. Prelude to the French Revolution: Monarchy in Crisis As the 18th century drew to a close, France’s costly involvement in the  American Revolution  and extravagant spending by King  Louis XVI  (1754-1793) and his predecessor had left the country on the brink of bankruptcy. Not only were the royal coffers depleted, but two decades of poor cereal harvests, drought, cattle disease and skyrocketing bread prices had kindled unrest among peasants and the urban poor. Many expressed their desperation and resentment toward a regime that imposed heavy taxes yet failed to provide relief by rioting, looting and striking. In the fall of 1786, Louis XVI’s controller general, Charles Alexandre de Calonne (1734-1802), proposed a financial reform package that included a universal land tax from which the privileged classes would no longer be exempt. To garner support for these measures and forestall a growing aristocratic revolt, the king summoned the Estates-General (â€Å"les etats generaux†)–an assembly representing France’s clergy, nobility and middle class–for the first time since 1614. The meeting was scheduled for May 5, 1789; in the meantime, delegates of the three estates from each locality would compile lists of grievances (â€Å"cahiers de doleances†) to present to the king. The French Revolution at Versailles: Rise of the Third Estate France’s population had changed considerably since 1614. The non-aristocratic members of the Third Estate now represented 98 percent of the people but could still be outvoted by the other two bodies. In the lead-up to the May 5 meeting, the Third Estate began to mobilize support for equal representation and the abolishment of the noble veto–in other words, they wanted voting by head and not by status. While all of the orders shared a common desire for fiscal and judicial reform as well as a more representative form of government, the nobles in particular were loath to give up the privileges they enjoyed under the traditional system. By the time the Estates-General convened at Versailles, the highly public debate over its voting process had erupted into hostility between the three orders, eclipsing the original purpose of the meeting and the authority of the man who had convened it. On June 17, with talks over procedure stalled, the Third Estate met alone and formally adopted the title of National Assembly; three days later, they met in a nearby indoor tennis court and took the so-called Tennis Court Oath (â€Å"serment du jeu de paume†), vowing not to disperse until constitutional reform had been achieved. Within a week, most of the clerical deputies and 47 liberal nobles had joined them, and on June 27 Louis XVI grudgingly absorbed all three orders into the new assembly. The French Revolution Hits the Streets: The Bastille and the Great Fear On June 12, as the National Assembly (known as the National Constituent Assembly during its work on a constitution) continued to meet at Versailles, fear and violence consumed the capital. Though enthusiastic about the recent breakdown of royal power, Parisians grew panicked as rumors of an impending military coup began to circulate. A popular insurgency culminated on July 14 when rioters stormed the Bastille fortress in an attempt to secure gunpowder and weapons; many consider this event, now commemorated in France as a national holiday, as the start of the French Revolution. The wave of revolutionary fervor and widespread hysteria quickly swept the countryside. Revolting against years of exploitation, peasants looted and burned the homes of tax collectors, landlords and the seigniorial elite. Known as the Great Fear (â€Å"la Grande peur†), the agrarian insurrection hastened the growing exodus of nobles from the country and inspired the National Constituent Assembly to abolish feudalism on August 4, 1789, signing what the historian Georges Lefebvre later called the â€Å"death certificate of the old order. † The French Revolution Turns Radical: Terror and Revolt In April 1792, the newly elected Legislative Assembly declared war on Austria and Prussia, where it believed that French emigres were building counterrevolutionary alliances; it also hoped to spread its revolutionary deals across Europe through warfare. On the domestic front, meanwhile, the political crisis took a radical turn when a group of insurgents led by the extremist Jacobins attacked the royal residence in Paris and arrested the king on August 10, 1792. The following month, amid a wave of violence in which Parisian insurrectionists massacred hundreds of accused counterrevolutionaries, the Leg islative Assembly was replaced by the National Convention, which proclaimed the abolition of the monarchy and the establishment of the French republic. On January 21, 1793, it sent King Louis XVI, condemned to death for high treason and crimes against the state, to the guillotine; his wife  Marie-Antoinette  (1755-1793) suffered the same fate nine months later. Following the king’s execution, war with various European powers and intense divisions within the National Convention ushered the French Revolution into its most violent and turbulent phase. In June 1793, the Jacobins seized control of the National Convention from the more moderate Girondins and instituted a series of radical measures, including the establishment of a new calendar and the eradication of Christianity. They also unleashed the bloody Reign of Terror (â€Å"la Terreur†), a 10-month period in which suspected enemies of the revolution were guillotined by the thousands. Many of the killings were carried out under orders from Robespierre, who dominated the draconian Committee of Public Safety until his own execution on July 28, 1794. You read "American and French Revolutions" in category "Essay examples" His death marked the beginning of the Thermidorian Reaction, a moderate phase in which the French people revolted against the Reign of Terror’s excesses. The French Revolution Ends: Napoleon’s Rise On August 22, 1795, the National Convention, composed largely of Girondins who had survived the Reign of Terror, approved a new constitution that created France’s first bicameral legislature. Executive power would lie in the hands of a five-member Directory (â€Å"Directoire†) appointed by parliament. Royalists and Jacobins protested the new regime but were swiftly silenced by the army, now led by a young and successful general named Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821). The Directory’s four years in power were riddled with financial crises, popular discontent, inefficiency and, above all, political corruption. By the late 1790s, the directors relied almost entirely on the military to maintain their authority and had ceded much of their power to the generals in the field. On November 9, 1799, as frustration with their leadership reached a fever pitch, Bonaparte staged a coup d’etat, abolishing the Directory and appointing himself France’s â€Å"first consul. † The event marked the end of the French Revolution and the beginning of the Napoleonic era, in which France would come to dominate much of continental Europe. Similarities America ; France Revolutionary Twins? The American and French Revolutions were fought several years and an ocean apart. However, they feature enough similarities that some people initially consider them â€Å"mirror struggles. †Ã‚   After all, there are some easy comparisons:   both revolutions occurred in the later eighteenth century. Both subverted an existing, monarchical government. Finally, both created ripe conditions for constitutionalism and deep patriotism. But dig more deeply, and you’ll find that this â€Å"same revolution, different continent† concept is not as tidy as it initially appears. Further similarities between the two revolutions are just different enough to produce profound distinctions between the two revolutions. Although most scholars believe that the two revolutions influenced one another (as well as had profound worldwide impact), each revolution is a very distinct and singular struggle for freedom, identity, and an improved way of life. Indeed, scholars have built entire careers on this subject, and rich debate and information is available online or at your local library. However, here are a few fundamental elements shared by the revolutions, with intricate but important differences highlighted: Causes Both the American Revolution and the French Revolution were borne of dire economic conditions. Economic challenges definitely contributed to the basis for both revolutions. However, each nation’s money-related woes were quite unique. The American Revolution had roots in the financial pressure that Britain placed on the New World; because Britain was economically dependent on the colonies, it kept taxing them. However, the colonists didn’t oppose the taxation itself. They were more vexed by the lack of a reasonable basis for the taxation, feeling that they received little or no benefit from their unds that were being spent â€Å"back in the old country. †Ã‚   This phenomenon—commonly known as taxation without representation—infuriated the colonies, building the basis for their revolt. Classic images of hungry, poverty-stricken French peasants are still familiar. Indeed, the pre-revolution French economy was dismal and had been for decades. As a secon d-tier trading nation, France was unable to pay off national debts using the scant amount of money it received on the taxes for traded goods. To make up for this deficit, the King imposed further taxes, especially on the peasants. Paradoxically, the wealthiest nobles were not obligated to pay taxes. This allowed the King to successfully sell titles, pulling the two social classes further apart. So although the British tax-related woes were also tied to royal greed and exploitative control, they were relatively common to any new colonist establishment. France’s case, while certainly tax-related, was more deeply rooted in a historic division of social class. Although the rich and poor had long been separated, the King’s selling of titles totally isolated the two groups. This resulted in famine and extreme poverty for the lower classes, and left them no choice but to revolt. Goals Both revolutions were undertaken with the goal of independence in mind. The American Revolution was not initially or even primarily fought for independence. Independence almost became a â€Å"by-product† of the colonists’ initial attempt to remove unfair taxes levied on them by British Parliament. On the other hand, France’s decades of class division and its burgeoning interest in thinkers like Rousseau (who emphasized the importance of human rights) sparked a popular interest in a more independent way of life. The influence of speeches, articles, and pamphlets from gifted writers and orators like revolution leaders Jacques-Pierre Brissot and Maximillien Robespierre also fueled this desire for freedom. Finally, the success of the American Revolution (and the colonists’ resulting independence from British rule) arguably acted as an incentive for revolt. American-French Relationships Both revolutions spurred a strong response from the other nation. Before 1789, most people (excluding the Americans of the new United States) lived with the general form of government their ancestors had known for centuries, sually hereditary monarchy. After the French Revolution began in 1789, no form of government could be accepted as legitimate without justification. The revolutionaries established a republic in 1792, and henceforth republicans around the world would challenge monarchists. Overall, the French Revolution offered the world something totally novel: an ideology that allowed and encouraged t he questioning of historic power structures. This ideology borne of the French Revolution laid the groundwork for other ideologies, including nationalism, socialism, and eventually communism. In fact, early communist leaders Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels both commented extensively on the French Revolution, hoping to find important lessons for building and governing communities. North Americans showed special interest in the French Revolution, believing the events of 1789 drew heavily on their own experience with Britain. The French Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen seemed to borrow strikingly from the states’ bill of rights. Even more direct influence took place when American Thomas Jefferson, resident in France at this time, passed along specific ideas to the legislators through the Marquis de Lafayette. Although the French Revolution took a far different path than the North American variety, this interaction was close, so it is not surprising that the initial U. S. reaction to the French Revolution was positive. Not all Americans approved of the France’s methods. For example, John Adams declared his early and ongoing disapproval, and the Federalist Party’s support began to waver toward the Revolution’s end. The Reign of Terror also did little to create American approval and drew criticism from some prominent American statesmen. However, the Jefferson-led Republican Party remained largely supportive throughout most of the revolutionary decade. Famous Documents Both revolutions produced similar and seminal political documents. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen was adopted in France in August 1789 by the National Constituent Assembly. Drafted by the Marquis de Lafayette, it was intended as part of a transition from an absolute to a constitutional monarchy, and presented the ideas of popular sovereignty and equal opportunity. This document, which defined a set of universal individual and collective rights, was to be considered valid in all times, in all places, for all people. This novel way of thinking totally contradicted the traditional French idea of people being born into a nobility or into another favored class. It also eliminated the concept of people enjoying or being denied special rights based on family lineage of status, which clearly dismantled centuries of French ruling structure. The principles outlined in the Declaration sprung from the theories of philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau and other Enlightenment thinkers. However, the French Declaration is at least partly inspired by the declaration of Human Rights contained in the U. S. Declaration of Independence, adopted on July 4, 1776, and on the Virginia Declaration of Rights, developed by American George Mason in June 1776, which was itself based on the English 1689 Bill of Rights. The Declaration of the Rights of Man also showed similarities to the United States Constitution (1787) and the United States Bill of Rights, which was adopted in 1789, at approximately the same time as the Declaration of the Rights of Man. Like the U. S. Constitution, The French Declaration provided for a national defense, and emphasized equality before taxation (which was distinctly different from traditional France, in which the Catholic Church and the nobility were exempt from most taxes). Like these American documents, France’s Declaration prohibits ex post facto application of criminal law and proclaims the presumption of innocence to a crime suspect. Finally, the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen provides for freedom of speech and of the press, and addresses freedom of religion. The Declaration departs from seminal American documents in some important ways. It’s vital to note that the Declaration is largely individualistic. It focuses less on the rights of a political or religious group and more on the singular citizen, thus straying from America’s â€Å"we the people† stance. The Declaration also fails to address the freedom of assembly, liberty of association, or the right to strike, which were important American tenets. Differences Self-Identification and Independence * France was a well-established nation long before the French revolution. It was not facing any acute external dangers in the late 1780s. In contrast, the American revolution was a struggle for self-identification and independence from another nation. In France, the essential motive of the revolution was a stratification transformation of the society because â€Å"the third estate† saw the clergy and the nobles as social parasites. Attitudes Toward Monarchy * The Americans were not anti-monarchists from the very start. They considered their rights as the British subjects were being violated, and their main complaints were aimed against the British Parliament. In France, the revolution was very much against the monarch and his power. Revolutionists saw the monarch as a traitor and acted aggressively toward the royal family. That led them to accuse the monarch of conspiracies against the French people, which in turn led to the execution of the royal family. Social Stratification * Social equality was not the main concern of the American revolution. Slavery was abolished in the Northern states, but it did not drastically influence the social stratification of American society. In France, the whole social structure was made up of three traditional estates: clergy, nobles and others. The revolution transformed all of them. Elimination of the traditional privileges based on the social origin was the main goal of the French revolution. Revolution and Religion * The American patriots did want to break with the Church of England, but the American revolution was not driven by a religious goal. The French revolution was, and it accomplished most of those goals. It eliminated the privileges of the clergy. Monasteries and churches were closed, the monks and nuns were encouraged to return to the private life. Many priests were killed. The Cult of Reason emerged during the revolution as part of the new France’s plan to â€Å"de-Christianize† the country. It stressed enlightenment and rationalism over the believe of a deity. Revolutionary Values and Mottos * John Locke formulated three basic values which were adopted by the American patriots: life, liberty and property. They fought for the idea that governments were obliged to preserve these values. The French revolution proclaimed three values too: liberty, equality and brotherhood, or death. The last part was adopted during the period of terror in 1793-1794. Thus, the common value shared by both revolutions was the pursuit of liberty. How to cite American and French Revolutions, Essay examples

Ethics Values In Organizational Psychology -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Ethics Values In Organizational Psychology? Answer: Introduction The managerial ethics is considered as the principles or the rules that are dictated by the senior management of the organization (Guiso, Sapienza Zingales, 2015). The guidelines are helpful in the control of the lower managers decision so that they can face any inherent conflict of ethical values in the organization. The managerial ethics are considered as the set of standards that managers use for complex decision-making cases (Guiso, Sapienza Zingales, 2015). The ethics are considered as the moral codes that underline the behavior of the persons regarding the right act or the wrong act (Fleischman et al., 2017). The moral codes are concerned with the established principles and usually varies from organization to organization. The managerial ethics are concerned with the actions manual that the managers of the organizations can refer to. Coles Supermarkets, Australia, was founded in the year 1914 is one of the reputed chains in the retail and supermarket industry(Coles.com.au, 2017). The company has over 800 supermarkets spreading all over Australian market. Coles Supermarket has recently been in news as it is accused of involving in child labor (Coles.com.au, 2017). The operating income of the company is A$ 1.9 billion in the year 2016 (Coles.com.au, 2017). The Australian supermarket has been accused of selling foods supplied by a Thai company, which involves child labor inprawn peeling activities. Coles has faced an ethical dilemma regarding the involvement of children in the factory processes. The company has also faced dilemma of using forced labor in their manufacturing process(Coles.com.au, 2017). This essay would focus on the theoretical concepts of managerial ethics in examining the particular ethical dilemma of the firm. Two theories would be used to explain managerial ethical decision making such as utilita rianism theory and deontology theory. The concluding part would reflect on the effect of the leaders on the ethical decision-making activities of the organization. Discussion The findings of Ford and Richardson (2013) reveals that ethics plays an important role in the decision making process of the companies. It is important to prevent oneself from engaging in unethical decision making practices. As argued by Morris and McDonald (2013), it is important to draw a line of distinction between the morals and ethics within the decision making process. The term morale is more appropriately used in the context of decision making in personal life (Ford Richardson, 2013). On the other hand, the ethical decision making is usually reserved for the purpose of group decision making, which is often relevant to the organizational context. The organizations expect their members to behave in the ethically right manner so that there is no damage to the goodwill of the firm (Ford Richardson, 2013). The organizational managers tend to achieve the right motivation, but there is sometimes right action and sometimes there is the presence of wrong actions. It is important to incorporate ethics in the process of decision making so that the organization doesnt have the liability of engaging in unethical business practices. As commented by Crane and Matten (2016), for making ethical business decisions, it is important to place core values in the core functioning of the organization. These core values would help in providing the goals and requirements which would be used for making appropriate decision making (Ford Richardson, 2013). This focused decision can lead to changes in the decision criteria which expands the entire length and breadth of the business network (which is being denoted by the blue tabs in the following figure)- The additional business related decisions such as business mission, code of conduct and others which would enhance the compliance criteria of making all decisions in the organizations. As commented by Epstein and Buhovac (2014), it is imperative for the organizations to consider the various ethical practices which would help the organizational managers to act in a better way (Ford Richardson, 2013). The managers of Coles Supermarkets strives to engage in ethical decision making practices by keeping in mind the following ethical components- Promotion of good and reduction of harm- The company strives to adopt strategies that benefit the maximum number of people and causes harm to the minimum number of people (Kahane et al., 2015). However, there are instances when the company is bound to take certain decisions in which there is non-benefit of all the concerned stakeholders. Compliance- The compliance component is concerned with the companys values as well as code of ethics (Miller, 2016). The organizational members are bound to abide by the same and there would be escalation if there are any deviations. The organizational actions should fulfill the legal requirements and this should be done in a regular manner. Promotion of trust- The actions of the employees should be honest and should foster trust and faith among the internal as well as external stakeholders (Ford Richardson, 2013). There should be sufficient promotion of goodwill among the audience so that there is sufficient goodwill of the organization (Eyal, 2014). Coles Supermarket knows how to accept their own mistakes when there is an issue concerning the ethical aspects of their behaviors. Preservation of right- Coles always keeps in mind that there should be ethical conduct of the business practices. The company checks whether a particular business option is feasible to them in terms of the ethical aspect (Ford Richardson, 2013). The negative impact of the particular chosen option is also determined, which would have an impact on the organizational rights. As opined by Pullen and Rhodes (2015), the utilitarianism is considered as one of the most popular normative ethical theory that is concerned with the measurement of right and wrong to the different outcomes that would be produced based on choosing of particular actions. This approach to ethics is considered with the assessment of the companys action in terms of its consequences and net outcomes. In this approach, the net costs as well costs to all the company stakeholders are being assessed at the individual level(Pullen Rhodes, 2015). In this ethical dilemma, the supermarket was involved in the child laborpractices which indicate that this step was beneficial for the internal stakeholders of the company (Pullen Rhodes, 2015). The child labor was involved in the prawn peeling activity, which ensured that the supermarket was able to make huge profit by selling prawn food materials in their store. This was due to the fact that the involving children implies that the organization wou ld be having cheap labor and hence there would be more profits. This notion was well supported by the management of Coles since the company aimed to increase its profits considerably over few years. The utilitarianism theory focuses on the fact that the utility is considered as the overall pleasure which is derived from an action, which is not inclusive of the sufferings of any entity which is involved in the action (Salloch et al., 2015). The theory is concerned with giving greatest happiness to the highest number of people. In this scenario, the measure was in favor of most of the stakeholders related with the company except the children themselves (Pullen Rhodes, 2015). This was due to the fact that this measure was involved in increasing the profit of the organization, which is the end motive of most of the private sector organizations. This is the reason that the stakeholders supported the decisions of the company and also went ahead in selling items that had child labor in the manufacturing process. The basis of the utilitarianism theory rests on thefact it is important to derive equality of all the persons involved with the decision and it is important to have equal consideration of all the interests (Fryer, 2016). The ethical dilemma of Coles can be solely attributed to this principle. They were aware of the fact that the decision to involve children would not be well appreciated by the child care NGOs and the children themselves(Pullen Rhodes, 2015). There were also possibilities of harassments by the news agencies if they reveal the fact that the reputed supermarket involves forced labor in their business operations. The utilitarianism theory also does not focus on the discrimination of the individuals and tries to focus on the viewpoints of each stakeholder. As opined by Pullen and Rhodes (2015), the utilitarianism approach is concerned in terms of the outcomes and the consequences. This is concerned with the overall benefits as well as overall costs to all the stakeholders at the personal level. This theory aims to achieve the highest good and all the interest of the entity should be fulfilled or considered equally when decision making activity needs to be done. It is also important to understand the actual consequences of this approach on the decision making approach of the firm. The utilitarianism method is considered as a practical and straight forward method in deciding the correct moral action of an individual in a particular situation. It is also imperative to foresee all the benefits as well as harms, which are related with the selection of particular actions. The each course of action has different impact on the various subjects involved and hence it is important to consider the benefit of all the stakeholders involved when maki ng a business decisions. As commented by Broad (2014), the deontology theory of ethics is one of the normative ethical position that throws light on the judgement of an actions morality by some fixed rules. There is often the rise of a moral obligation which may arise from any internal or external source(Pullen Rhodes, 2015). This may include some religious law, cultural values, personal values, and others. As argued by Hunt (2016), this theory holds the fact that there is morally obligatory nature of some acts which are independent of the probable effects on human welfare. One of the greatest philosopher, Kant, opined that nothing is good apart from the good will. He defined good will as the will of acting in accordance with the moral law and respect for that particular law, which arises out of moral obligations (Vitell Hunt, 2015). The moral law is often considered as the categorical imperative which has the foundation in the human reason(Vitell Hunt, 2015). This theory places importance on good in itse lf which is concerned with the things that are considered to be good such as pleasure, perseverance, intelligence and others. The ethical dilemma of Coles can be attributed to their moral obligation of doing something good to the society and especially for the children. The deontological theory instructs the individuals to work in such a way that it gives utmost importance to humanity, which is being violated by Coles Supermarket (Baynes, 2013). The decision to include the child labor may include benefits to the company but they do not serve the wider purpose of humanity(Vitell Hunt, 2015). The contractarian deontological theories focus on the fact that morally wrong acts are the ones that are forbidden by principles, which are governed by the social contract principles. The theory of deontology theory has impacted Coles as the company failed to take a morally right decision. The making of good ethical decisions is important for making trained sensitivity and it is important the considerations that would impact the course of action of the companies(Vitell Hunt, 2015). The deontology theory has a sub-section known as patient centered deontology, in which there is emphasis on the peoples rights as it is believed that the people have their own rights on the labor, body and the talents (Surprenant, 2015). As opined by Hale (2016), this theory are rights based and there are versions of this theory that are considered as agent neutral as they give rise to the moral agents(Lefkowitz, 2017). This theory is based on the rights of the people and this right is being used to provide goof consequences without the consent of that person(Vitell Hunt, 2015). This point of view of deontological theories focuses on the use of others labor, body or talent and this does not use the consent of the other person(Lefkowitz, 2017). This version of the theory believes on the fact that if the act is morally justifiable one, then it is morally irrelevant if anyone performs the act with the intention of having any bad consequences(Vitell Hunt, 2015). When there is the assessment of the risk conduct, then any potential good consequences should be discounted. The ethical decision making must be made on the basis of the deontological principles. The Kantian philosophy or the deontological theory has an important role to play in the decision-making process of the managers (Vitell Hunt, 2015). The autonomy is considered as one of the most important parameters of the ethical decision making, which is being supported by the Kantian philosophy (Malpas, 2014). The aspect of autonomy is important in the process of ethical decision making since this principle frees the concerned decision-maker of the various personal desires subjective concerns. Luft (2015) argues that autonomy is concerned with the freedom of making adequate decision based on the morally right actions in a universal framework, rather than the self-interested concerns(Vitell Hunt, 2015). The ethical model of the Kantian philosophy would take into account the decision-making activity in a universal sense moral conduct and places least interest to the self-interested concerns. The ethical model questions the leaders about their own style of decision-making activity( Vitell Hunt, 2015). It instructs the leaders to give less importance to greed, self-interest and selfish motives by posing various questions. There are various kinds of questions done to the decision-makers such as Can I rule out monetary influence, political influence and self-interest(Lefkowitz, 2017)? The ethical decision makers following the categorical imperative should consider the fact that the ethical decision is universal in nature and it applies in a consistent way across all cultures, time and other societal norms(Hoffman, FrederickSchwartz, 2014). This principle also focuses on the aspect of reversibility where there is the process of role reversal(Lefkowitz, 2017). The decision maker should try to place themselves in the place of his followers and try to understand their opinions. The managerial decision making is also dependent on the ethical consideration triangle which deals with the intention, duty and the respect for others (Lefkowitz, 2017). The duty component is associated with the doing the right things in the right possible way. The leaders of Coles often struggle to incorporate the right decisions in the organizations and should have a good intention (Vitell Hunt, 2015). The managers are often in a dilemma whether they are proceeding with the morally good will or not. It is important to have good intentions while making decision-making in the organizations. The dignity and the respect to others are being maintained when a good ethical manger engages in decision making in the organization(Vitell Hunt, 2015). The public, stakeholders, society and the organizations are always in a need to make good decisions that would have a positive effect on the organizations. They would not be able to work in a manner that is disrespectful to the organizations and to the society at large. The deontological theory also places importance on the back and forth communication (Kehoe, 2015). The communication process would comprise of the various modes of interaction with all the major stakeholders of the firm. It is important to open all the channels of communication to the major stakeholders groups. Their individual inputs should be considered well for the decision-making activity of the managers in Coles Supermarkets(Kehoe, 2015). Their input would lead to more equitable as well as mutually satisfied decision, which can be achieved through the non-symmetrical methods(Kehoe, 2015). The information, which is gained from the ongoing communication with the multiple stakeholders would play an important role in the decision-making process. Coles have a wide network of the stakeholders and hence the company takes extra initiative in communicating with all the major stakeholders. The ethical decision making also takes into account the mutually beneficial solutions (Trevino Nelson, 2016). The ethical decision-making model allows the leaders of Coles to gain adequate information about specific issue from a source, which is present outside the organization. They use the derived information to make decisions for their departments(Kehoe, 2015). There are sufficient collaboration and dialogue that often lead to mutually beneficial solutions. Conclusion I personally feel that the leaders should always make ethical decisions for their organizations. There would be many instances in the organizations, during which the managers or the leaders would have to choose between one ethical option and one unethical option. I think that they should adopt more transparency in the decision-making process and they should open all channels of communications. They should engage in choosing morally right alternatives when they have to make critical decisions for the organizations. There should be the inclusion of moral conduct organically in each and every layer of the organization. I feel that the leaders should view everyone as respect, dignity and with trust. The managers would interact with variety of people in day to day life such as team members, customers and others. The leaders must be able to create a unique organizational culture in Coles or any other organization in which the people would treat each other in a mutually benefitting manner a nd this would be reflected in their work performances as well. Coles Supermarkets should not have engaged in involving child labor in their organizations. This step could have replaced by recruiting adult workers in their workforce. This would have meant a higher labor charges for the organization, but then the company would have been proud to announce that they have followed ethical code of conduct. References Baynes, K. (2013).Critical theory. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Broad, C. D. (2014).Five types of ethical theory(Vol. 2). Routledge. Coles Supermarkets. (2017).Coles.com.au. Retrieved 2 October 2017, from https://www.coles.com.au Crane, A., Matten, D. (2016).Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press. Epstein, M. J., Buhovac, A. R. (2014).Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Eyal, N. (2014). Using informed consent to save trust.Journal of medical ethics,40(7), 437-444. Fleischman, G. M., Johnson, E. N., Valentine, S., Walker, K. B. (2017). Ethics versus Outcomes: Managerial Responses to Incentive-Driven and Goal-Induced Employee Behavior. Ford, R. C., Richardson, W. D. (2013). Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. InCitation classics from the Journal of Business Ethics(pp. 19-44). Springer Netherlands. Fryer, M. (2016). A role for ethics theory in speculative business ethics teaching.Journal of Business Ethics,138(1), 79-90. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., Zingales, L. (2015). The value of corporate culture.Journal of Financial Economics,117(1), 60-76. Hale, B. (2016). Rights, Rules, and Respect for Nature.The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics, 211. Hoffman, W. M., Frederick, R. E., Schwartz, M. S. (Eds.). (2014).Business ethics: Readings and cases in corporate morality. John Wiley Sons. Hunt, S. D. (2016). Personal moral codes and the Hunt-Vitell theory of ethics.Business Ethics: New Challenges for Business Schools and Corporate Leaders: New Challenges for Business Schools and Corporate Leaders, 18. Kahane, G., Everett, J. A., Earp, B. D., Farias, M., Savulescu, J. (2015). Utilitarianjudgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good.Cognition,134, 193-209. Kehoe, W. J. (2015). Marketing Ethics: Theory and Pedagogy. InProceedings of the 1982 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference(pp. 261-264). Springer, Cham. Lefkowitz, J. (2017).Ethics and values in industrial-organizational psychology. Taylor Francis. Luft, S. (2015). The neo-Kantian reader. Malpas, J. (2014). Self, other, thing: Triangulation and topography in post-Kantian philosophy.Philosophy Today. Miller, A. G. (Ed.). (2016).The social psychology of good and evil. Guilford Publications. Morris, S. A., McDonald, R. A. (2013). The role of moral intensity in moral judgments: An empirical investigation. InCitation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics(pp. 463-479). Springer Netherlands. Pullen, A., Rhodes, C. (2015). Ethics, embodiment and organizations.Organization,22(2), 159-165. Salloch, S., Wscher, S., Vollmann, J., Schildmann, J. (2015). The normative background of empirical-ethical research: first steps towards a transparent and reasoned approach in the selection of an ethical theory.BMC medical ethics,16(1), 20. Surprenant, C. W. (2015). PHIL 3094. Trevino, L. K., Nelson, K. A. (2016).Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right. John Wiley Sons. Vitell, S. J., Hunt, S. D. (2015). The general theory of marketing ethics: the consumer ethics and intentions issues.Handbook on ethics and marketing, 15-37.